Clinical trials
Full profile accessFollow clinical development from study design and recruitment through results.
- Trial phase
- Status
- Readouts
Drug intelligence / Profile preview
This entry refers to a clinical research context (the MADCO-PC trial, NCT01993836) conducted by **Duke University** that compared two standard anesthetic maintenance strategies: inhalational anesthesia using **isoflurane** and total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) using **propofol**. The study specifically enrolled elderly patients (aged 60 and older) undergoing major non-cardiac, non-neurological surgeries, including procedures for **lumbar spondylosis**, **cervical spondylosis**, **hip osteoarthritis**, and **knee osteoarthritis**. The primary objective was to determine if the choice of anesthetic agent—isoflurane (a volatile halogenated ether) versus propofol (an alkylphenol)—influences the incidence of postoperative cognitive decline (POCD) and changes in Alzheimer's disease-related biomarkers in the cerebrospinal fluid. Isoflurane acts primarily by modulating GABA-A and glycine receptors and inhibiting NMDA receptors, while propofol acts as a potent positive allosteric modulator of the GABA-A receptor.
Beyond the preview
Explore the evidence, development activity, and competitive landscape with Gosset’s full data platform.
Follow clinical development from study design and recruitment through results.
Explore development by indication, patient population, and geography.
Trace asset ownership, licensing agreements, and commercial partnerships.
Explore the patent landscape and regulatory exclusivity around an asset.
Compare development programs by target, modality, and indication.
Connect source evidence and development news to your research questions.
See how Gosset can support your research on isoflurane + propofol.