Clinical trials
Full profile accessFollow clinical development from study design and recruitment through results.
- Trial phase
- Status
- Readouts
Drug intelligence / Profile preview
Etoposide + lobaplatin (EL) is a chemotherapy combination regimen primarily used for treating small cell lung cancer (SCLC). This combination pairs etoposide, a topoisomerase II inhibitor, with lobaplatin, a third-generation platinum compound. ## Composition and Mechanism Lobaplatin was specifically developed as an alternative to cisplatin, designed to maintain similar antitumor efficacy while reducing toxicity. It was discovered during studies of platinum compounds for cisplatin-resistant tumors[1]. Pre-clinical studies showed that compared with cisplatin, lobaplatin has equivalent activity against tumors but with improved tolerability and stability, and lower toxicity[1]. The standard dosing regimen for this combination typically consists of: - Lobaplatin: 30 mg/m² administered on day 1 - Etoposide: 100 mg/m² administered on days 1-3 - Treatment cycles are typically 21 days in duration[1][5] ## Clinical Efficacy Multiple clinical trials have compared etoposide + lobaplatin (EL) with the standard etoposide + cisplatin (EP) regimen: 1. In a phase III non-inferiority randomized clinical trial with 234 patients with extensive-stage SCLC: - Median progression-free survival (PFS): 5.1 months for EL vs. 5.3 months for EP (P=0.786) - Median overall survival (OS): 10.6 months for EL vs. 9.7 months for EP (P=0.701) - Disease control rate: 85.5% for EL vs. 86.7% for EP (P=0.848)[1][5] 2. In a randomized phase II study for limited-stage SCLC with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy: - 1-year PFS rates: 50.8% for EL vs. 56.5% for EP - 1-year OS rates: 72.2% for EL vs. 73.9% for EP[2] These results demonstrate that EL is non-inferior to EP in terms of efficacy for SCLC treatment. ## Toxicity Profile The EL regimen shows a notably different toxicity profile compared to EP: 1. Reduced gastrointestinal toxicity: - Significantly lower incidence of nausea (22.3% vs. 40.5%; P=0.003) - Significantly lower incidence of vomiting (14.1% vs. 35.1%; P<0.001)[1][5] 2. Reduced nephrotoxicity: - 2.5% for EL vs. 11.7% for EP (P=0.008)[1][5] 3. Hematological toxicities: - Similar rates of leukopenia and neutropenia between EL and EP regimens - Thrombocytopenia has been reported as a dose-limiting toxicity for lobaplatin at higher doses (50 mg/m²), but appears manageable at the 30 mg/m² dose used in these studies[6] 4. Radiation-related toxicities (when combined with radiotherapy): - Lower incidence of acute radiation esophagitis in the EL group - Similar incidence of radiation pneumonitis between groups[2] ## Clinical Applications The EL regimen has been studied in both: - Extensive-stage SCLC as first-line therapy - Limited-stage SCLC with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy - Some evidence of activity in second-line treatment and beyond[6] Overall, etoposide + lobaplatin represents an alternative first-line treatment option for SCLC patients, offering similar efficacy to the standard EP regimen but with improved tolerability, particularly regarding gastrointestinal and renal toxicities.
Beyond the preview
Explore the evidence, development activity, and competitive landscape with Gosset’s full data platform.
Follow clinical development from study design and recruitment through results.
Explore development by indication, patient population, and geography.
Trace asset ownership, licensing agreements, and commercial partnerships.
Explore the patent landscape and regulatory exclusivity around an asset.
Compare development programs by target, modality, and indication.
Connect source evidence and development news to your research questions.
See how Gosset can support your research on Etoposide + Lobaplatin.