Target intelligence / Profile preview

Physical barrier at surgical site

Molecular classification
Other (medical device/material: includes natural and synthetic polymers such as oxidized regenerated cellulose, hyaluronic acid, carboxymethylcellulose, poly(lactic acid), poly(caprolactone), polyethylene glycol, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene)
01

Overview

Physical barriers at surgical sites are medical materials—often films, hydrogels, or fiber meshes—applied to wound surfaces during surgery to physically separate adjacent tissues and reduce the risk of post-surgical adhesions. These devices are made from biocompatible and often biodegradable polymers such as oxidized regenerated cellulose, hyaluronic acid, carboxymethylcellulose, poly(lactic acid), or synthetic materials like expanded polytetrafluoroethylene. Their function does not involve selective molecular recognition; instead, they act by preventing tissues from adhering as they heal. Examples include products like Seprafilm (hyaluronic acid/carboxymethylcellulose), Interceed (oxidized regenerated cellulose), and Preclude (expanded PTFE). While generally considered safe, effectiveness varies and challenges such as incomplete coverage, need for removal, or inflammatory reactions are clinical concerns[1][2][3][4].

Other names
Adhesion barriersurgical barrieranti-adhesion barrierphysical barrier devicepost-surgical adhesion barrier
02

Mechanism of action

Physical tissue separation; some may include delivery of anti-inflammatory agents or drugs to enhance anti-adhesion effect[1][2][4]

03

Biological functions

Other (physical separation of tissues, prevention of post-surgical adhesion formation)
04

Disease associations

Other (used in surgery to prevent pathological adhesions, not targeted for disease mechanisms directly)
05

Safety considerations

Incomplete coverage of surgical siteRisk of foreign body reaction or chronic inflammation, especially with non-absorbable materials[1]Some materials require removal (e.g., non-biodegradable expanded polytetrafluoroethylene), necessitating a second surgery[1]Potential for infection, improper placement, or interference with healingEfficacy in preventing adhesions is often limited and sometimes controversial[1][3]

Beyond the preview

Go deeper on Physical barrier at surgical site.

Explore the evidence, development activity, and competitive landscape with Gosset’s full data platform.

Drug pipeline

Full profile access

Explore the programs pursuing this target and their development progress.

  • Drug candidates
  • Developers
  • Development stage

Clinical trials

Full profile access

Follow the clinical studies evaluating therapies directed at this target.

  • Trial design
  • Status
  • Readouts

Competitive landscape

Full profile access

Compare approaches across drug candidates, modalities, and indications.

  • Programs
  • Modalities
  • Indications

Literature & evidence

Full profile access

Investigate the research and source evidence behind target biology and development.

  • Publications
  • Sources
  • Analysis

Patents

Full profile access

Explore patent activity around therapies and technologies addressing this target.

  • Patents
  • Assignees
  • Technologies

Research & analysis

Full profile access

Connect target biology, drug development, and emerging evidence in your research.

  • Biology
  • Development news
  • Analysis

Bring the full picture into focus.

See how Gosset can support your research on Physical barrier at surgical site.

Explore the full profile

Gosset Free

Get started with Gosset.

Enter your work email and we’ll be in touch with next steps.

Work email preferred.

Book a call